So here are the best options, in my opinion, based on all the caveats above. Of course, not everyone shares this view, and that's fine, but again, what I'm presenting here is my opinion, and I believe its worth the extra effort to maximise the quality of the file. And yes, this does happen, because people tend to hold magazines and books quite close, whereas they tend to look at art prints from further away. For example, a commercial book or magazine print might show up something that wasn't visible in an art print. If I'm delivering to a client, I may not always know how they are going to use it.Ī different method of printing might show up issues that weren't obvious before. I may decide at some point to make a large print, or crop a section of it. I also may not know how that image will be used in the future. I want to know if I save an image to my archive, it's at the best quality I could have made it, not whether or not anyone will notice because I will know. When I process an image, I want to know it's the best it can be, not whether someone else will notice or not.
#Acdsee pro 10 process fuji raw files iso
Such factors include the ISO of the image, the subject, the print size, the method of printing, and so on.īut I would argue that whether or not you can notice on a print or a webpage isn't the point. And sure, that may be true, but it depends on many factors. People argue that you can't see the difference if you're only posting to social media, or if you print at a specific size. Does it matter?Īnother typical response that I get every time I write one of these is that it doesn't matter. Not everyone considers this an important issue, and so, if you are okay with Lightroom's processing for your images, great. It can also lead to a "worm" like pattern in areas of flat colour if you push the file. I'm not going to get into a big technical discussion on this, because I've done that before many times, so here's the short version: If you're shooting with a Fuji camera that has an X-Trans sensor, then the results in Lightroom can lead to mushy details and artefacts around edges. The chances are that if you're reading this, you already know the answer. Why do Fuji files need special processing? All I can do is share my opinion based on my experience and skills in analysing images. If you do things differently, that's fine. I understand, having done several variations of this article at this point, that no matter what I write someone somewhere will take issue with this and disagree. It must be a useable solution for working with lots of images in a project, and it must support Fuji film simulation modes at a minimum. I also have a minimum set of requirements. This is the standard for which I would aim. It should not look too "digital" but instead should have the quality to pass an editor in a magazine or submission to a stock agency. While I believe that much of this is subjective, there are also technical standards, which I think are not, and while different people might have different standards, for me, the image should look clean, and un-processed. It also depends heavily on the type of image, how you prefer to process, and so on.
I'm basing this on processing thousands of Fuji files in many different applications. Bun in this context, I'm talking purely about technical image quality. There are, of course, more things that can enter into the equation, such as workflow, ease of use, and cost. In this context, though, I'm talking about what gives you the most natural-looking, and the most artefact-free results when working with Fuji raw files. The term "best" is often quite misleading because as I said, it's often subjective. I should also note that I've written eBook guides about most of these options, and I've included links where applicable. Introductionīefore I get to the actual results, here's a bit of a preamble about the "what and why" of this, as well as a few disclaimers. But, today, I' going to break my own rule and tell you what I think are the best options, in my opinion, in order of preference. So, in the past, I've tried to present lots of different options, and let people decide for themselves. What I might find the "best" isn't necessarily what someone else might find the best for them. I generally try and not directly answer that for a few reasons, the most obvious of which is that the answer is subjective.
#Acdsee pro 10 process fuji raw files how to
I've been covering how to process Fuji X-Trans files on this website for quite a few years now, and I still regularly get questions from people asking me what the best software for processing Fuji RAW files is.
0 kommentar(er)
